Wayne Dupree
News • Politics • Culture
Congress: You All Need To Be Arrested For Out Of Control Spending
June 25, 2024
post photo preview

It has been said before that the issue that Congress is facing is not one of money but rather one of expenditure.  It is my recommendation that an amendment be added to the constitution that would impose a tax rate adder (equal to the rate increase) specifically targeting all congressional members, their staff, and federal employees, with the exception of active-duty military personnel. This would serve as a way to prevent Congress from increasing the rates of income and capital gains tax.  

In the event that the tax measure is approved by Congress and signed into law by the president (thereby increasing the income tax rate from 35% to 39.6%), the additional tax rate would be 4.6%, resulting in a total tax rate of 44.2% for all members of Congress, their staff, and government workers.

In the event that tax hikes are approved without corresponding cutbacks in budget expenditure, the amendment would additionally include a tax rate multiplier in addition to the tax rate adder. During periods of fiscal deficit, the multiplier would be at a higher value.

We have gotten ourselves into a difficult financial situation. Over the next ten years, each year's expenditures for Social Security and Medicare will increase by almost one trillion dollars. On the other hand, Mr. Trump has said that he does not want to reduce these programs, which brings his party into harmony with the long-standing position of the Democrats. In addition, Republicans will not agree to tax hikes. In the meanwhile, budgetary projections for military are far lower than what will be required to safeguard the United States in a world that is becoming more perilous. Furthermore, there will be no place for further domestic expenditure on young families who are already beginning to raise children. The route of least resistance, which is to increase expenditure without raising income, will make an already difficult financial position even more difficult to manage.

In addition to this, the United States of America has a civilization that is fast becoming older. In 1960, nine percent of the nation's population consisted of people aged 65 and over. This percentage is now 18%, and it is anticipated that it will increase to 23% over the course of the next three decades. There will be an increase in the expense of providing older Americans with basic income and medical security as the proportion of older Americans in the electorate continues to rise. There are probably not going to be a lot of older voters who will support a budgetary approach that would diminish their benefits.

A gradual loss of financial independence for the United States of America, followed by a sudden fall in economic activity, will result from continuing on our present budgetary trajectory. In order to service its debt, the United States will have to approach the rest of the world for assistance, and it would be irresponsible to believe that other countries would continue to do so forever. There is a possibility that nations on whom the United States depends may gradually withdraw their support, and then abruptly they will do so when some unexpected shock crystallizes their growing reservations. Herb Stein, an economist who passed away at the end of his life, once said, "If something cannot go on forever, it will stop."

It is imperative that we acknowledge the repercussions of these truths and immediately begin taking measures to ensure the financial future of the United States. It is imperative that leaders who possess vision confront these challenges in a realistic manner and convince the general population that they must either pay for the services they want or agree to reduce their funding for those programs. When presented with this option, I have a strong suspicion that people would demonstrate their support for the increased taxes that are required to maintain the stability of Social Security and Medicare for the foreseeable future, to assist families with young children, and to protect the nation from ongoing dangers.

As an alternative, one may adopt the mindset of Wilkins Micawber, a feckless character from Charles Dickens's book "David Copperfield." Micawber clung to the unrealistically optimistic conviction that "something will turn up." This day of reckoning will come, regardless of whether or not we are prepared for it. It is always simpler to put off the day of reckoning. We need to be ready for the storms that are yet to come while there is still time.

community logo
Join the Wayne Dupree Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
WDShow 8-19 Quick Clip

Here's what you missed on August 19, 2024

00:02:40
This Happened Under The Jurisdiction Of Tim Walz

A woman in the US was shot at with exploding pellets by armored police while on her front porch, describing it as authorities "waging war on our neighborhood." Tanya Kerssen, along with neighbors, stood at the entrance of their apartment building as police and the National Guard patrolled their Minneapolis street. The city faced intense protests following the death of George Floyd. A video shared on Twitter, watched over 26 million times, shows an armored vehicle and numerous officers moving through the street.

00:00:40
Think Twice Before Using DEI Against Kamala Harris: A Risky Move with Consequences

For those using DEI against Kamala Harris, do you really have to? With a record that bad, do you really have to do it or does that satisfy your hearts and minds? Because it WILL backfire and don't blame cheating when it does via

00:03:45
Family of "Friends" Star Matthew Perry Thanks Law Enforcement for Pursuing Justice Following his Tragic Passing

"his [Perry's] family has publicly expressed their grief and gratitude toward law enforcement for their serious approach to his case..."

https://waynedupree.com/2024/08/Family-Friends-Star-Matthew-Perry-Thanks-Law-Enforcement

Controversy Erupts as State Fair of Texas Bans Guns - High-Profile Republicans Outraged!

"This move has ignited a firestorm among conservative circles and caught the attention of high-profile Republican legislators who have historically championed gun rights in Texas...."

https://waynedupree.com/2024/08/Controversy-Erupts-as-State-Fair-of-Texas-Bans-Guns

Russian Court Sentences Dual US-Russian Citizen to 12 Years for Alleged Treason in $51 Charity Donation Case

Dual US-Russian citizen "Karelina, an amateur ballerina, found herself in legal turmoil after making a modest donation of $51 to Razom for Ukraine, a charity that insists its efforts are centered on humanitarian aid and disaster relief..."

https://waynedupree.com/2024/08/Russian-Court-Sentences-Dual-US-Russian-Citizen-to-12-Years-for-Alleged-Treason

post photo preview
Biden's Presidency: Controversy, Defeat, and a Tarnished Legacy - What Delegates Won't Tell You
Why Biden's Presidency Was Doomed: A Tale of Promise, Failure, and Controversy
In Chicago on Monday, accolades for President Biden are expected to soar as delegates at the Democratic convention celebrate him, likening him to FDR and George Washington for his "voluntary" relinquishment of power. However, this adulation is anticipated to be short-lived. Biden, perceived by many Americans as an unsuccessful leader and facing potential defeat in a rematch with Donald Trump, is predicted to make an inglorious exit from the presidency—a tenure riddled with illegitimate election results to  failing to fulfil promise to unify the nation and serve as a bridge from the Trump era when he took office. 
 
Taking over the presidency after two failed attempts, Biden wanted to be seen as the preferable option over Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren by promising to be a unifier against Trump's divisiveness. Yet, his tenure has been marked by a departure from these pledges.
 
Upon securing a 50-50 Senate majority in the 2021 Georgia runoffs, Democrats seized what they saw as a historic chance to enact their entire agenda. This led Biden into agreements that aligned more with Bernie Sanders’s vision and granted Elizabeth Warren considerable influence over financial regulations. His administration's policies were heavily influenced by Democratic leaders in Congress aiming for significant government expansion unseen since LBJ’s Great Society era.
 
The administration initiated its ambitious plans with a $1.9 trillion spending bill under the guise of COVID-19 relief in March 2021—despite the pandemic waning and economic recovery underway. This move sowed the seeds for unprecedented inflation rates not seen in 40 years by June 2022, diminishing American real incomes.
 
Throughout his political career spanning half a century, Biden has demonstrated a tendency to follow rather than lead party trends. His initial chief of staff, Ron Klain, encouraged unity within Democratic ranks over bipartisan cooperation, leading to dwindling approval ratings. Much of his extensive Build Back Better plan faltered in Congress; however, bills like the Covid relief package and the Inflation Reduction Act that did pass—strictly along party lines—led to record peacetime debts and deficits.
 
While long-term effects of these acts remain uncertain, immediate consequences include restrictive drug price controls impacting medical research and misallocated capital due to green subsidies totaling $1 trillion. Although bipartisan efforts like the Chips Act and infrastructure bills promise some infrastructural improvements, they come at steep costs.
 
Biden's left-leaning stance on border security has stymied any potential for bipartisan immigration reform. His foreign policy is yet another area awaiting full assessment until conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East reach resolutions. The hasty withdrawal from Afghanistan signaled weakness globally, emboldening adversaries including Vladimir Putin’s Russia and Iran-backed groups threatening Israel's existence.
 
On a positive note, Biden made strides in Pacific diplomacy through initiatives like Aukus pact enhancements, bolstered military alliances with Japan, and strengthened ties with the Philippines aimed at counteracting Chinese dominance aspirations.
 
Yet perhaps most critically undermining U.S defense capabilities have been proposed budget cuts after adjusting for inflation each year of his presidency—an approach potentially compromising future U.S global commitments amidst rising adversarial challenges.
 
Instead of distancing from Donald Trump’s shadow, Biden continually spotlighted him—labeling Republicans en masse as MAGA extremists while equating moderate electoral integrity measures with historical racial injustices like Jim Crow laws—a divisive rhetoric further polarizing national politics.
 
Most controversially breaking norms was Biden's implicit support for prosecuting Trump criminally—a stance rendering Trump a "martyr" among Republican voters facilitating his nomination comeback attempt against Biden perceived as beatable opposition.
 
Had Biden opted out of seeking re-election early into 2023 acknowledging growing concerns around age-related decline—he might have paved way for fresher faces across party lines better equipped addressing pressing domestic and international issues confronting America today.
 
Instead forced out last minute by internal pressures including Nancy Pelosi amongst others within his own party fearing widespread electoral setbacks—Biden leaves behind a presidential race featuring an inexperienced Vice President Kamala Harris against an unpopular former President Donald Trump.
 
​​​​​​​This leaves Americans facing leadership choices reflective of an even more divided nation than found at Joe Biden’s ascension—an unfortunate testament to his presidential legacy characterized not only by foreign policy misadventures but also domestic turmoil marked by rampant inflationary pressures alongside surging crime rates post-Trump era—an undeniable downturn underlining Joe Biden's presidential term fraught with missed opportunities towards fostering national unity or substantive progress across key policy domains.
Read full Article
post photo preview
Controversial Proposed Bill Initially Took Aim at Trump's Security by Democrat Lawmaker

In a bold move that highlighted the growing divide in American politics, a few months ago, Mississippi Congressman Bennie Thompson, a key Democrat figure and the House Committee on Homeland Security's ranking member, stirred controversy with his proposed legislation aimed at stripping Secret Service protection particularly targeting former President Donald Trump following his felony conviction.

This bill, which garnered support from various Democrat allies, was seen as a direct attack on conservative values and the sanctity of presidential security.  Criticism from conservative circles was swift and fierce, especially after the harrowing incident at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, where an assassination attempt against Trump dramatically unfolded.

The former president's encounter with danger underscored the paramount importance of unwavering security measures for all sitting and former presidents, regardless of political affiliation or legal battles. This event not only accentuated the perceived recklessness behind Thompson’s legislative push but also rallied Trump's base around the need for equal treatment under the law and unimpeded Secret Service protection.

Moreover, Trump's resilience in the face of such adversity – planning to continue his campaign efforts by attending the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee – is emblematic of a fighter's spirit cherished by conservatives. His ability to stand strong, even when literally under fire, has galvanized support across the right-wing community.

The tragic fallout from the attempted assassination – one rally-goer dead and two critically injured – further compounds the gravity of ensuring robust security for political figures. It raises pertinent questions about the wisdom behind Thompson’s bill and whether political vendettas should ever compromise an individual’s safety.

Additionally, Thomas Matthew Crooks' identification as the assailant by authorities adds another layer to this complex narrative. His fatal attempt on Trump’s life is not just an attack on a single individual but an affront to democratic principles that demand peaceful discourse and safety for all political leaders.

This incident starkly illustrates how essential it is to uphold steadfast security measures for all presidents - serving or former - without letting partisan politics dilute our commitment to their safety.

As conservatives rally around this belief, it becomes clear that any attempts to undermine such protections are not only misguided but potentially dangerous in today’s charged political climate.

 

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
Unbelievable Outcome After Chaos Unveils Trump's Unstoppable Supporters!
The aftermath of the shooting at the Trump rally was not just a testament to the former president's resilience but also became a rallying cry for his supporters. Social media platforms were ablaze with messages of solidarity and defiance, echoing Trump’s unyielding spirit. The incident, while alarming, seemed only to strengthen the resolve of MAGA supporters across the nation. Critics and political analysts weighed in, some condemning the violence as an attack on democracy itself, while others speculated about its potential impact on Trump's campaign and future rallies. Security protocols were scrutinized, with discussions about how such breaches could be prevented in the future dominating news cycles.
 
In the days following, Trump's campaign saw an unprecedented surge in donations, signaling strong support from his base amid concerns over his safety. His team capitalized on this momentum, organizing more rallies and public appearances to demonstrate that not only was Trump unharmed but also more determined than ever to pursue victory in the upcoming election. The phrase "No weapon formed against you shall prosper" resonated beyond social media posts and became a mantra among Trump's followers, symbolizing their unwavering faith in him as a leader who could withstand any challenge.
 
As the dust settled, it became clear that this event would not deter Donald Trump or his supporters. Instead, it underscored their commitment to their cause and solidified their bond. The shooting at the rally in Butler, Pennsylvania marked a pivotal moment in American politics—one that highlighted deep divisions but also showcased the resilience of political figures and their followers in the face of adversity.
 
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals